4.3 Article

Policy articulation and paradigm transformation: the bureaucratic origin of China?s industrial policy

期刊

REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 204-231

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1679222

关键词

Industrial policy; bureaucrats; state autonomy; careers; China; policy articulation; bureaucratic competition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reveals the competitive dimension of bureaucratic decision-making and its role in driving the transformation of industrial policy paradigms in China, emphasizing the importance of intrabureaucratic competition in mediating international political economic environment and national policy outcomes.
Existing studies of state-led industrial development argue that state autonomy is essential for formulating consistent and coherent industrial policies. This article shows that autonomous bureaucracy, while useful for fending off the politics of interest groups, is not free of politics in itself. Using Chinese industrial policy-making as a strategic case study, this article uncovers the competitive dimension of bureaucratic decision-making and the extent to which it serves as a driving force for industrial policy paradigm change in China. Equipped with a theory of policy articulation, this article details the strategies used by multiple superagencies and groups of career bureaucrats to vie for industrial policy authority within the Chinese state. In sum, this article seeks to expose the role of intrabureaucracy competition in mediating international political economic environment and national policy outcomes. Looking forward, this article proposes that the renewed focus on industrial policy by many national governments compels an analytical re-engagement with the role of large bureaucracies in economic decision-making and the kind of organizational and cognitive frameworks by which bureaucrats mobilize to chart our industrial landscapes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据