Stakeholders versus Firm Communication in Social Media: The Case of Twitter and Corporate Social Responsibility Information

Building on legitimacy theory and prior work on stakeholder management, we study firm Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication in social media. In particular, we analyze the content of over a million microblogs on Twitter relating to CSR in the banking industry. We focus on key issues considered by banks in their CSR reports, which we classify into Core or Supplementary depending on their connection with core business activities. We find that the use of Twitter to communicate CSR information in social media suggests that significant differences exist between the information interests of companies and stakeholders. Outside stakeholders focus on Core CSR issues, whilst firm insiders are relatively more likely to communicate Supplementary CSR issues. Firm insiders' information dissemination appears biased towards favorable information, and consistent with a legitimacy-based use of social media. Event studies conducted on dates with significant exogenous CSR news confirm the findings of 'parallel' talking, and no resemblance in the CSR issues communicated by firms and stakeholders in social media.

Automated summary

Building on legitimacy theory and stakeholder management, the study analyzes over a million microblogs on Twitter related to CSR in the banking industry, finding significant differences in information interests between companies and stakeholders in social media. The study also observes that insiders in firms tend to communicate more positive information regarding CSR, aligning with a legitimacy-based use of social media. Event studies confirm the lack of resemblance in the CSR issues communicated by firms and stakeholders.