4.2 Article

Reasons and influential recommendations associated with HPV vaccination among Chinese college students in the USA

期刊

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 602-609

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1705831

关键词

Chinese college student; HPV vaccination; reasons; recommendation

资金

  1. Smernoff Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Only 38.3% of Chinese college students in the United States received the HPV vaccine, with the main reason being lack of recommendation from healthcare providers. Recommendations from doctors were the most influential source in deciding HPV vaccine uptake. Factors associated with reasons and recommendation sources included attitudes toward HPV, gender, school year, age, major, and health insurance, highlighting the important role of healthcare providers in promoting HPV vaccination in this population.
Objectives: To evaluate (a) reasons for not receiving recommended doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, (b) the most influential recommending source in getting the HPV vaccine, and (c) associated factors among Chinese college students in the United States. Methods: A cross-sectional design utilizing a structured self-report questionnaire was used. Participants: A network sample of 449 participants aged 18 or older completed the survey between March and May of 2018. Results: Only 172 participants (38.3%) had received the HPV vaccine. The most common reason was that participants had never received recommendations from healthcare providers regarding HPV vaccines. Recommendations from doctors were the most cited source in deciding HPV vaccine uptake. Factors associated with reasons and recommendation sources included attitudes toward HPV, gender, school year, age, major, and health insurance. Conclusions: Healthcare providers play an important role in promoting HPV vaccination among Chinese college students. More research is needed for this understudied population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据