4.3 Article

Health-Related Correlates of Demonstrated Smartphone Expertise in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 510-518

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0733464820902304

关键词

aging; older adults; mobile technology; smartphones; mobile health technology; gerotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the relationship between demonstrated expertise in smartphone use and self-reported health attitudes and behaviors in 85 community-dwelling adults, with findings showing differential relations with health outcomes and replicating aspects of the digital divide. Older adults with restricted mobility or diabetes were found to have less knowledge of and more difficulties in using smartphones, highlighting the need to optimize health-related functions for this population.
Smartphone use in the older population is understudied, despite a growing use of technology in this age group. This study characterized the relation of demonstrated smartphone expertise to self-reported health attitudes and behaviors in 85 community-dwelling adults, mean age 77.24 (7.64) years. Self-report instruments included a demographic survey, a health attitudes measure, and a mobility checklist. Participants completed a behavioral challenge, the Smartphone Task for Older Adults (STOA). Demonstrated expertise in smartphone use (STOA-DESU), familiarity with apps, and ability to replicate functions after demonstration showed differential relations with health outcomes. DESU was positively associated with education, income, Altarum Consumer Engagement Measure (ACE), and Life Space Questionnaire (LSQ) scores and was negatively associated with age and daily medications. Additional findings replicated aspects of the well-known digital divide, and showed that those older adults with restricted mobility or diabetes had less knowledge of and more difficulties in using smartphones. Despite these problems, health-related functions must be optimized for older populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据