4.3 Article

Freight transportation planning for regular and hazmat materials with simplified risk functions

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1187-1214

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2020.1712672

关键词

Function linearization; hazmats; TDG; GPM; rail freight transportation planning; risk distribution; routing

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses routing regular and dangerous commodities in railway freights transportation using a mixed integer nonlinear programing model. The advantages of using bifurcation of flows on risk-cost tradeoffs and route planning decisions are highlighted, and experiments on hypothetical networks as well as the rail network of the Province of Quebec in Canada are presented and analyzed. Comparisons between different routing decisions associated with the proposed model with bifurcation of material flows provide managerial insights on solving hazmat freight routing problems.
Routing regular and dangerous commodities in railway freights transportation is discussed in this paper. Based on a link-based modeling approach, a mixed integer nonlinear programing model is developed. The model takes into account weather stability conditions of urban and rural areas and spatial distribution of risk at yards and around links as it impacts these zones along the routes. This paper also discusses the advantages of using bifurcation of flows on risk-cost tradeoffs and route planning decisions. The widely used nonlinear risk function is linearized and then the problem was solved to optimality using a commercial software. Results of the experiments on two hypothetical networks and one based on the rail network of the Province of Quebec in Canada are presented and analyzed. Routing decisions associated with both variants of the proposed model with bifurcation of the material flows are compared to obtain managerial insights on the model in solving hazmat freight routing problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据