4.6 Article

Perceived Greenwashing: The Effects of Green Marketing on Environmental and Product Perceptions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
卷 171, 期 4, 页码 719-739

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04461-0

关键词

Environmental sustainability; Website design; Interactivity; Green value; Green risk; Purchase intentions; Brand attitudes; Facial expressions; Mouse interactions

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green marketing can help companies gain competitive advantage but may also lead to greenwashing, potentially impacting profitability and ethics. Consumer perceptions of greenwashing vary and are influenced by website interactivity.
Many firms are striving to improve their environmental positions by presenting their environmental efforts to the public. To do so, they are applying green marketing strategies to help gain competitive advantage and appeal to ecologically conscious consumers. However, not all green marketing claims accurately reflect firms' environmental conduct, and can be viewed as 'greenwashing'. Greenwashing may not only affect a company's profitability, but more importantly, result in ethical harm. Therefore, this research extends past greenwashing studies by examining additional influences on and outcomes of perceived greenwashing. To do so, we conducted two studies, an interview study with consumer product and consulting firms, as well as an experiment examining consumers interacting with a company website. For these studies, we used multiple methods, including interviews, questionnaires, and neurophysiological techniques. We found that perceived greenwashing relates not only to environmental and product perceptions, but also to consumers' happiness while interacting with the website. We also found that website interactivity relates to perceived greenwashing, environmental and product perceptions, and to the amount of interaction with the website. We conclude by discussing managerial and ethical implications for research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据