4.5 Article

AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance

期刊

ELECTRONIC MARKETS
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 427-445

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7

关键词

Artificial intelligence; Chatbot; Anthropomorphism; Social presence; Compliance; Customer service

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study empirically examined how verbal anthropomorphic design cues and the foot-in-the-door technique affect user request compliance through a randomized online experiment. Results demonstrated that both anthropomorphism and the need to stay consistent significantly increased the likelihood of users complying with a chatbot's request for service feedback. Additionally, the study showed that social presence mediates the effect of anthropomorphic design cues on user compliance.
Communicating with customers through live chat interfaces has become an increasingly popular means to provide real-time customer service in many e-commerce settings. Today, human chat service agents are frequently replaced by conversational software agents or chatbots, which are systems designed to communicate with human users by means of natural language often based on artificial intelligence (AI). Though cost- and time-saving opportunities triggered a widespread implementation of AI-based chatbots, they still frequently fail to meet customer expectations, potentially resulting in users being less inclined to comply with requests made by the chatbot. Drawing on social response and commitment-consistency theory, we empirically examine through a randomized online experiment how verbal anthropomorphic design cues and the foot-in-the-door technique affect user request compliance. Our results demonstrate that both anthropomorphism as well as the need to stay consistent significantly increase the likelihood that users comply with a chatbot's request for service feedback. Moreover, the results show that social presence mediates the effect of anthropomorphic design cues on user compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据