4.6 Article

'Peasants are peasants': Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China

期刊

URBAN STUDIES
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 1598-1614

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0042098020911876

关键词

contact hypothesis; displaced villagers; intergroup relation; prejudice; relative deprivation theory; social identity theory

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CUHK14609219]
  2. Worldwide Universities Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores contemporary prejudice against displaced villagers in urban China, pointing out that this prejudice is actively reproduced by media discourses and reinforced in everyday life. The prejudice of urbanites against displaced villagers is seen as stemming from feelings of relative deprivation and a desire to maintain a positive ingroup identity of urban and 'civilised' living.
This article explores contemporary prejudice against displaced villagers in urban China, drawing on a project on urban sprawl in Yinchuan where rural villages are absorbed into the urban area. The research demonstrates that media discourses about chaiqian baofahu and suzhi that stigmatise displaced villagers are being actively reproduced in everyday life in newly built urban neighbourhoods. Urbanites' prejudice against displaced villagers can be viewed as, on the one hand, a result of the feelings of relative deprivation from unfavourable comparisons with displaced villagers, while on the other hand, a response to maintain a positive ingroup identity - in this case, an urban and 'civilised' way of life. The article then examines the effectiveness of contact as a means for reducing prejudice, and reveals that intergroup contact in urban neighbourhoods does not necessarily create mutual understanding and trust. The article highlights the structural causes of prejudice and concludes by arguing for social transformation to challenge and reduce prejudice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据