4.4 Article

Test- or judgement-based school track recommendations: Equal opportunities for students with different socio-economic backgrounds?

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 193-216

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12356

关键词

school transition; school track recommendation; SES; prior performance; school leavers' test; teacher judgements; educational inequality

资金

  1. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [OCW/PromoDoc/1065001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that students' SES had an impact on judgement-based track recommendations, but not on test-based track recommendations. Teachers were more likely to base their recommendations on students' prior performance instead of being influenced by students' SES.
Background There are concerns that school track recommendations that are mostly based on teachers' judgements of students' performance ('judgement-based recommendations') are more biased by students' SES than school track recommendations that are mostly based on standardized test results ('test-based recommendations'). A recent policy reform of the Dutch educational system has provided us the unique opportunity to compare the effects of students' SES on these two types of track recommendations. Aims The aim of this study was to examine the differences between test-based and judgement-based recommendations regarding the direct and indirect effect of students' SES at student level and school level. Sample The sample consisted of 8,639 grade 6 students from 105 Dutch primary schools. Methods Data were analysed using two-level multilevel mediation models. Results Track recommendations were higher for high-SES students. This was mostly due to differences in students' prior performance. SES also had a small, direct effect on judgement-based, but not on test-based recommendations. The effects were partly situated at school level. Conclusion Overall, the results indicated that teachers based their track recommendations mostly on students' prior performance without being biased by students' SES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据