4.3 Article

Narcissism in Political Participation

期刊

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 347-361

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0146167220919212

关键词

narcissism; political participation; NPI; authority-seeking; superiority

资金

  1. Velux Foundation, Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The level of narcissism is positively correlated with political participation, where individuals with higher narcissism are more likely to engage in political activities such as contacting politicians, signing petitions, participating in demonstrations, donating money, and voting. Different components of narcissism have varying effects on political participation, with superiority and authority/leadership traits positively related to participation, while self-sufficiency is negatively related.
Much attention has focused on the social, institutional, and mobilization factors that influence political participation, with a renewed interest in psychological motivations. One trait that has a deep theoretical connection to participation, but remains underexplored, is narcissism. Relying on three studies in the United States and Denmark, two nationally representative, we find that those scoring higher in narcissism, as measured by the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-40 (NPI-40), participate more in politics, including contacting politicians, signing petitions, joining demonstrations, donating money, and voting in midterm elections. Both agentic and antagonistic components of narcissism were positively and negatively related to different types of political participation when exploring the subfactors independently. Superiority and Authority/Leadership were positively related to participation, while Self Sufficiency was negatively related to participation. In addition, the combined Entitlement/Exploitativeness factor was negatively related to turnout, but only in midterm elections. Overall, the findings support a view of participation that arises in part from instrumental motivations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据