4.2 Review

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 1-37

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12259

关键词

anxiety; depression; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies; meta-analysis; outcome measures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The IAPT program in the UK provides broadly effective evidence-based psychological therapies for anxiety and depression, with significant pre-post treatment effect sizes. Study findings also suggest that methodological features can influence effect sizes, highlighting the need for further research and discussion.
Objectives Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is a national-level dissemination programme for provision of evidence-based psychological treatments for anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom. This paper sought to review and meta-analyse practice-based evidence arising from the programme. Design A pre-registered (CRD42018114796) systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A random effects meta-analysis was performed only on the practice-based IAPT studies (i.e. excluding the clinical trials). Subgroup analyses examined the potential influence of particular methodologies, treatments, populations, and target conditions. Sensitivity analyses investigated potential sources of heterogeneity and bias. Results The systematic review identifiedN = 60 studies, withN = 47 studies suitable for meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed large pre-post treatment effect sizes for depression (d = 0.87, 95% CI [0.78-0.96], p < .0001) and anxiety (d = 0.88, 95% CI [0.79-0.97], p < .0001), and a moderate effect on functional impairment (d = 0.55, 95% CI [0.48-0.61], p < .0001). The methodological features of studies influenced ESs (e.g., such as whether intention-to-treat or completer analyses were employed). Conclusions Current evidence suggests that IAPT enables access to broadly effective evidence-based psychological therapies for large numbers of patients. The limitations of the review and the clinical and methodological implications are discussed. Practitioner points IAPT interventions are associated with large pre-post treatment effect sizes in depression and anxiety measures. IAPT interventions are associated with moderate treatment effect sizes with regards to work and social adjustment. A reduction in dropout and also the prevention of post-treatment relapse via the offer of follow-up support are important areas for future development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据