4.5 Article

Former Communist party membership and present-day entrepreneurship

期刊

SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 1783-1800

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-020-00364-6

关键词

Entrepreneurship; Communist party; Elite networks; Post-socialist countries; Central and Eastern Europe

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-18-00262]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-18-00262] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that former Communist party membership facilitated business set-up but not business longevity in Central and Eastern European countries. Individuals who joined the former ruling party typically lacked entrepreneurial traits such as unobservable personality traits, ability, motivation, and entrepreneurial aptitude.
After the collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe, former party members were particularly likely to start businesses and become entrepreneurs. What remains unclear, however, is whether this entrepreneurial activity was driven by the resources, information, and opportunities provided by former party membership or because individuals with specific individual attributes were more likely to become Communist cadres (self-selection). This study is the first to separate the causal effect of former Communist party membership from self-selection. Using individual-level Life in Transition-III survey data and a control function approach, we find that former Communist party membership has facilitated business set-up but not business longevity in Central and Eastern European countries. We also show that people who joined the former ruling party had fewer of the traits associated with entrepreneurship such as unobservable personality traits, ability, motivation, and entrepreneurial aptitude, and as such were negatively self-selected. We show that former Communist party membership still matters for business practices, business ethics, and the nature of doing business in transition economies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据