4.0 Article

Differences in severity of eating disorder symptoms between adults with depression and adults with anxiety

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40519-020-00947-y

关键词

Eating disorders; Depression; Anxiety; Comorbidity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that individuals with anxiety alone had more severe eating disorder (ED) symptoms compared to those with depression alone across different groups. Participants without any comorbidities showed the least severe ED symptoms, while those with both comorbidities exhibited the most severe symptoms.
Objectives Anxiety and depression are both considered maintaining factors for eating disorders (ED) but it is still unclear if one is more strongly associated with ED symptoms than the other. We examined differences in severity of ED symptoms among adults with either, both, or neither depression and anxiety. Methods Volunteers (N = 3,780) to the project implicit mental health website () self-reported their ED status (current ED:n = 374, past ED:n = 436; no ED:n = 2,970), their current depression/anxiety status, and their ED symptoms (using the Eating Attitudes Test). ANOVAs with post hoc comparisons were used to examine relationships between ED symptoms and comorbid depression/anxiety status among currently ill, recovered, and never ill individuals. Results Participants without comorbidities had the least and participants with both comorbidities had the most severe ED symptoms (p = .021). Participants with anxiety alone had more severe ED symptoms relative to those with depression alone across groups (current ED:p = .024; past ED:p = .019; no EDs:p = .021). Discussion These findings demonstrate, in contrast with an earlier study among youth with EDs (Hughes et al., 2013), that comorbid anxiety may be linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid depression. It is possible that anxiety serves as a maintaining factor for ED symptoms such that dieting and other ED-related behaviors may function to modulate symptoms of anxiety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据