4.5 Article

The Combined Effect of Oseltamivir and Favipiravir on Influenza A Virus Evolution

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 1913-1924

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx138

关键词

influenza; population genetics; genetic hitchhiking; mutational meltdown

资金

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program [W81XWH-15-1-0317]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Prophecy Program, Defense Sciences Office (DSO) [HR0011-11-C-0095, D13AP00041]
  3. MediVector
  4. European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza virus inflicts a heavy death toll annually and resistance to existing antiviral drugs has generated interest in the development of agents with novel mechanisms of action. Favipiravir is an antiviral drug that acts by increasing the genome-wide mutation rate of influenza A virus (IAV). Potential synergistic benefits of combining oseltamivir and favipiravir have been demonstrated in animal models of influenza, but the population-level effects of combining the drugs are unknown. In order to elucidate the underlying evolutionary processes at play, we performed genome-wide sequencing of IAV experimental populations subjected to serial passaging in vitro under a combined protocol of oseltamivir and favipiravir. We describe the interplay between mutation, selection, and genetic drift that ultimately culminates in population extinction. In particular, selective sweeps around oseltamivir resistance mutations reduce genome-wide variation while deleterious mutations hitchhike to fixation given the increased mutational load generated by favipiravir. This latter effect reduces viral fitness and accelerates extinction compared with IAV populations treated with favipiravir alone, but risks spreading both established and newly emerging mutations, including possible drug resistance mutations, if transmission occurs before the viral populations are eradicated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据