4.3 Article

An intervention designed to investigate habit formation in a novel health behaviour

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 405-426

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1779272

关键词

Habit formation; behaviour change; habit maintenance; behaviour change techniques

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research shows that community members are more likely to develop healthy habits compared to students and maintain behavior and habit strength. Intentions, behavior, and habit strength are the key predictors of behavior change and habit formation maintenance.
Objectives:Understanding how to help people form habits is important in improving health interventions. The impact of two behaviour change techniques on behaviour (cues and monitoring) was tested, and the role of psychosocial factors that may predict behaviour change and habit formation were investigated.Methods:Participants (N = 186) were randomised to one of six conditions (behaviour monitoring vs habit monitoring vs irrelevant behaviour monitoring and cued vs not cued) and instructed to engage in a specific, novel behaviour every day for the following 3 weeks. Participants completed measures of behaviour, habit strength, prospective memory, attitude, intention, self-efficacy and motivation at three time points (pre-, post- and one-week follow-up).Results:All participants increased habit strength and behaviour. Post-hoc, it was found that community members, compared to students, developed stronger habits and maintained the behaviour and habit strength at one-week follow-up. Intention, behaviour and habit strength post-intervention moderated behaviour and habit strength maintenance.Conclusion:This research furthers our understanding of how to help people form healthy habits. It was found that any intervention seems to be effective in forming a habit and changing behaviour. Moreover, intention, habit and behaviour were the most important predictors of behaviour change and habit formation maintenance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据