4.3 Article

Effectiveness of Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease Among Dyads With Moderate Dementia

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY
卷 40, 期 10, 页码 1163-1171

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0733464820934683

关键词

dementia; caregiving; dyads; effectiveness; implementation

资金

  1. Administration for Community Living [90KSALGG0009]
  2. National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health [P30AG035982]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Kansas City implementation of the Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (RDAD) program, which targeted dyads with moderate dementia and caregivers, resulting in improvements in behavioral symptoms, physical activity, unmet needs, behavioral symptom distress, and caregiver strain from baseline to post-intervention. These findings suggest that the adapted RDAD intervention led to clinically meaningful improvements and may be scalable.
Replications of evidence-based dementia care receiver-caregiver dyad interventions in the community are scarce. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Kansas City implementation of Reducing Disability in Alzheimer's Disease (RDAD) among a convenience sample of dyads with moderate dementia, which addressed needs identified by nine participating community agencies. We hypothesized that dyads' mental health and physical activity outcomes would improve from baseline to end-of-treatment. The final analytic sample included 66 dyads. Outcomes improved (p< .01) from pre- to post-intervention: behavioral symptom severity (range 0-36) decreased from 11.3 to 8.6, physical activity increased from 125.0 to 190.0 min/week, caregiver unmet needs (range 0-34) decreased from 10.6 to 5.6, caregiver behavioral symptom distress (0-60) decreased from 15.5 to 10.4, and caregiver strain (0-26) decreased from 11.1 to 9.7. This adapted implementation of RDAD leads to clinically meaningful improvements and might inform scaling-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据