4.1 Article

The role of culture in the gendered division of domestic labor: Evidence from migrant populations in Europe

期刊

ACTA SOCIOLOGICA
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 24-47

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0001699320930073

关键词

Housework; epidemiological approach; effect of culture; gender roles; immigrants; cross-classified multilevel models; European Social Survey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses the "epidemiological approach" to analyze gender division of housework among international migrants, finding that when either the man or woman comes from a gender-traditional cultural background, there is a more equal division of household labor in couples. This cultural impact is consistent across destination countries and is only partially influenced by parental background, but diminishes among second generations.
An attractive explanation of the persistence of gender inequality in the division of domestic labor hinges on the role of culture. However, it is difficult to demonstrate the impact of cultural factors (e.g. social norms), as they are confounded with other institutional factors (e.g. social policies). This article deals with this issue by applying the emerging 'epidemiological approach' which focuses on international migrants as individuals who bring cultures differing from that prevailing in the national contexts in which they live. The study analyzes the gender division of housework of first- and second-generation immigrants living in countries covered by the second and fifth round of the European Social Survey. Applying cross-classified multilevel models and using several indicators of gender culture at both origin and destination, it is found that the female share of housework increases in couples when the man or the woman comes from a gender-traditional cultural background. The effect of culture is homogenous across destination countries and only partly explained by parental background. However, it tends to disappear among second generations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据