4.3 Article

Run by others: school autonomy in Shanghai's entrustment management reform

期刊

ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 594-608

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1772198

关键词

Shanghai; school autonomy; school-to-school collaboration; school management; entrustment management reform

资金

  1. China Post-doctoral Research Fund [14101-412126-17009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article examines the Shanghai experience of entrustment management reform, finding that the reform has reconstructed school leadership structure and decreased the autonomy of 'weak' schools, although the overall process has proceeded smoothly.
The promotion of school-to-school collaboration and school autonomy has popularized in the global trends of school system reform over the past few decades. This article examines the Shanghai experience by specifically taking the entrustment management reform as an illustrative example. Since 2007, the government has contracted 'good' schools in urban districts and private non-profit educational organizations to manage a group of relatively 'weak' schools in rural districts. Three 'weak' schools and their entrusted bodies were investigated in this study to elaborate the nature and structure of school autonomy in the new hierarchical management system. This article argues that rather than leading to substantial redistribution of the autonomy between the government and the school as stated, the reform has reconstructed the school leadership. A kind of 'one-side-collaboration' has emerged in 'weak' schools' decision-making processes, which has in effect decreased their autonomy. Nevertheless, the reform has generally proceeded smoothly. This can be articulated through understanding Confucian moral and interrelated autonomy, in contrast to the Western autonomy premised on egoism and rationality and emphasizing the self-other tension, and in China's political and bureaucratic contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据