4.1 Review

3D printing of glass by additive manufacturing techniques: a review

期刊

FRONTIERS OF OPTOELECTRONICS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 263-277

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12200-020-1009-z

关键词

three-dimensional (3D) printing; glass; fused deposition modeling (FDM); selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM); stereolithography (SLA); digital light processing (DLP); direct ink write (DIW); optical devices; microfluidic

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1107200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772270]
  3. Open Project Program of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics [2018-WNLOKF005]
  4. State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article focuses on the recent progress in 3D printing of glass, comparing different printing methods and analyzing their advantages and disadvantages for manufacturing functional glass objects. It also discusses the technological principles and applications of 3D printed glass objects, concluding with a summary of current achievements and future perspectives for the development of 3D glass printing technique.
Additive manufacturing (AM), which is also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, uses computer-aided design to build objects layer by layer. Here, we focus on the recent progress in the development of techniques for 3D printing of glass, an important optoelectronic material, including fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering/melting, stereolithography (SLA) and direct ink writing. We compare these 3D printing methods and analyze their benefits and problems for the manufacturing of functional glass objects. In addition, we discuss the technological principles of 3D glass printing and applications of 3D printed glass objects. This review is finalized by a summary of the current achievements and perspectives for the future development of the 3D glass printing technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据