4.1 Article

Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in State-Space LPV Model Identification Using Bayesian Neural Networks

期刊

IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 719-724

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCSYS.2020.3005429

关键词

State-space linear parameter-varying model identification; uncertainty quantification; Bayesian neural networks

资金

  1. United States National Science Foundation [1762595, 1912757]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1912757, 1762595] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter presents a variational Bayesian inference Neural Network (BNN) approach to quantify uncertainties in matrix function estimation for the state-space linear parameter-varying (LPV) model identification problem using only inputs/outputs data. The proposed method simultaneously estimates states and posteriors of matrix functions given data.
This letter presents a variational Bayesian inference Neural Network (BNN) approach to quantify uncertainties in matrix function estimation for the state-space linear parameter-varying (LPV) model identification problem using only inputs/outputs data. The proposed method simultaneously estimates states and posteriors of matrix functions given data. In particular, states are estimated by reaching a consensus between an estimator based on past system trajectory and an estimator by recurrent equations of states; posteriors are approximated by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the parameterized posterior distribution and the true posterior of the LPV model parameters. Furthermore, techniques such as transfer learning are explored in this letter to reduce computational cost and prevent convergence failure of Bayesian inference. The proposed data-driven method is validated using experimental data for identification of a control-oriented reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engine model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据