4.6 Article

Molecular diagnosis of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) in 162 patients and recommendations for genetic testing

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 989-997

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.220

关键词

molecular diagnosis; mosaicism; next-generation sequencing; PIK3CA; PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-13-PDOC-0029]
  2. Groupe Interregional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation (GIRCI) Est
  3. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC) National
  4. Societe Francaise de Dermatologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Postzygotic activating mutations of PIK3CA cause a wide range of mosaic disorders collectively referred to as PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). We describe the diagnostic yield and characteristics of PIK3CA sequencing in PROS. Methods: We performed ultradeep next-generation sequencing (NGS) of PIK3CA in various tissues from 162 patients referred to our clinical laboratory and assessed diagnostic yield by phenotype and tissue tested. Results: We identified disease-causing mutations in 66.7% (108/162) of patients, with mutant allele levels as low as 1%. The diagnostic rate was higher (74%) in syndromic than in isolated cases (35.5%; P = 9.03 x 10(-5)). We identified 40 different mutations and found strong oncogenic mutations more frequently in patients without brain overgrowth (50.6%) than in those with brain overgrowth (15.2%; P = 0.00055). Mutant allele levels were higher in skin and overgrown tissues than in blood and buccal samples (P = 3.9 x 10(-25)), regardless of the phenotype. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate the value of ultradeep NGS for molecular diagnosis of PROS, highlight its substantial allelic heterogeneity, and confirm that optimal diagnosis requires fresh skin or surgical samples from affected regions. Our findings may be of value in guiding future recommendations for genetic testing in PROS and other mosaic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据