3.9 Article

Modeling of the PM10 pollutant health effects in a semi-arid area: a case study in Zabol, Iran

期刊

MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 455-463

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-020-00874-y

关键词

Air pollution; PM10; Health effect modeling; Zabol; 120-day winds

资金

  1. Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Iran [1396.155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the short-term effects of exposure to PM10 in Zabol, Iran, from 2013 to 2015. The findings showed a significant impact on the residents' health, particularly with an increase in excess cases related to various health outcomes during the study period, indicating the urgent need for controlling dust storms in the region.
This study investigated the short-term effects of exposure particulate matter (PM10) in Zabol, Iran, from 2013 to 2015. The concentrations of PM10 recorded from 2013 to 2015 were given as the input to the software (AirQ 2.2.3) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to estimate the attributed proportion of the health effects and the number of excess cases related to total mortality (TM), cardiovascular mortality (CM), respiratory mortality (RM), hospital admissions due to cardiovascular disease (HACD), and hospital admissions due to respiratory disease (HARD). According to the data, 73 days during 2013-2014 and 144 days during 2014-2015 in Zabol exceeded the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) guideline limits. This finding indicates the impact of the windy period on the ambient air condition of Zabol's airshed. Moreover, the number of excess cases attributed to TM, CM, RM, HACD, and HARD per 100,000 people was estimated as 182, 96, 18, 94, and 243 individuals during 2013-2014. However, these values increased by about 50% during 2014-2015. This significant level of health effects of PM10 on the residents of Zabol necessitates urgent controlling/management actions to reduce dust storms in this region. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据