4.5 Article

There's a Bit of a Ripple-effect: A Social Identity Perspective on the Role of Third-Places and Aging in Place

期刊

ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR
卷 53, 期 5, 页码 540-568

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0013916520947109

关键词

aging in place; social identity; community spaces; third-places; wellbeing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the motivations and sources of well-being in older adults' engagement with third-places, highlighting the impact of social-spatial contexts on participation, the support of positive social identities in third-places, and the facilitation of well-being through enacting these identities. The findings suggest that third-places not only connect individuals within the community, but also serve as potential links to the wider community, providing insights for the development of age-friendly cities and the role of social identity processes in engaging with community groups in such spaces.
Urban sociology highlights an important role that a city's social infrastructure, or third-places, play in supporting healthy communities. Informed by social identity theorizing, this study explores when and why older adults engage with third-places and how a sense of wellbeing can be derived from their participation. Focus-group interviews were conducted with a sample of community-dwelling older adults (N= 31) to examine the nature of one such third-place, a suburban neighborhood bridge club. Thematic analysis suggests that (a) the socio-spatial context of third-places can both enable and restrict participation, (b) third-places can support positive social identities (as bridge players, club members, locals), (c) enacting these identities in third-places facilitates a sense of wellbeing, and (d) third-places are potential connectors to the wider community. We discuss the policy implications for the development of age-friendly cities and the role of social identity processes in engaging with community groups in third-places.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据