4.3 Article

Dual-earner parent couples' work and care during COVID-19

期刊

GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 66-79

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12497

关键词

care; coronavirus; COVID-19; dual-earner couples; gender equality; unpaid labour

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FT150100067]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT150100067] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in working parents having to juggle paid work and family care at home, leading to significant increases in unpaid work time for mothers and an increased share of childcare for fathers during the lockdown period. Satisfaction levels with work-family balance and partner's share of responsibilities varied during the pandemic, with some improvements but mostly negative outcomes, and some narrowing of gender differences in experiences compared to before the lockdown.
COVID-19 and the associated lockdowns meant many working parents were faced with doing paid work and family care at home simultaneously. To investigate how they managed, this article draws a subsample of parents in dual-earner couples (n= 1536) from a national survey of 2722 Australian men and women conducted during lockdown in May 2020. It asked how much time respondents spent in paid and unpaid labour, including both active and supervisory care, and about their satisfaction with work-family balance and how their partner shared the load. Overall, paid work time was slightly lower and unpaid work time was very much higher during lockdown than before it. These time changes were most for mothers, but gender gaps somewhat narrowed because the relative increase in childcare was higher for fathers. More mothers than fathers were dissatisfied with their work-family balance and partner's share before COVID-19. For some the pandemic improved satisfaction levels, but for most they became worse. Again, some gender differences narrowed, mainly because more fathers also felt negatively during lockdown than they had before.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据