4.3 Article

Precarious Education-to-Work Transitions: Entering Welfare Professions under a Workfarist Regime

期刊

WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 137-156

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0950017020931335

关键词

active labour market policies; education-to-work transitions; EU funding; intersectionality; precarity; precarisation; Slovenia; social reproduction; welfare professions; workfare

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship [ECF-2016 -310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the education-to-work transitions in female-dominated welfare professions in Slovenia post-crisis context. It finds a mismatch between established regulations and actual opportunities in the labour market under a workfarist regime, leading to difficulties in professional integration.
This article looks at the process of education-to-work transitions in female-dominated welfare professions within the Slovenian post-crisis context marked by a workfarist agenda. It departs from a scholarship that conceptualises precarity as a transitional vulnerability and disaffiliation exacerbated by workfarist policies to explore the contemporary experience of those trying to achieve professional integration under a volatile workfarist regime. The findings reveal a mismatch between established regulations for early career recruitment and professional licensing and actual chances in the labour market to meet these requirements through available workfarist non-standard, entry-level jobs/schemes designed for particular status and/or socio-demographic groups. It gives new evidence that European workfare regimes exacerbate precarity and a novel understanding of state-manufactured precarisation as an intersectional process of marginalisation and discrimination that not only hinders integration into welfare professions, but also downloads the costs of social reproduction on the next generation, causes precarious ageing and widens intersectional differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据