期刊
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 399-412出版社
ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2
关键词
-
资金
- National Institute for Health Research under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme [RP-PG-1211-20011]
- National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-1211-20011] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
Publications rarely discuss PPI activities in discrete choice experiments of healthcare interventions. This paper presents examples and a detailed case study showcasing the benefits of incorporating PPI across the preference research stages, despite challenges such as time, cost, and expectations. Further research comparing methods related to PPI in preference research would strengthen the literature.
Publications reporting discrete choice experiments of healthcare interventions rarely discuss whether patient and public involvement (PPI) activities have been conducted. This paper presents examples from the existing literature and a detailed case study from the National Institute for Health Research-funded PATHWAY programme that comprehensively included PPI activities at multiple stages of preference research. Reflecting on these examples, as well as the wider PPI literature, we describe the different stages at which it is possible to effectively incorporate PPI across preference research, including the design, recruitment and dissemination of projects. Benefits of PPI activities include gaining practical insights from a wider perspective, which can positively impact experiment design as well as survey materials. Further benefits included advice around recruitment and reaching a greater audience with dissemination activities, amongst others. There are challenges associated with PPI activities; examples include time, cost and outlining expectations. Overall, although we acknowledge practical difficulties associated with PPI, this work highlights that it is possible for preference researchers to implement PPI across preference research. Further research systematically comparing methods related to PPI in preference research and their associated impact on the methods and results of studies would strengthen the literature.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据