4.2 Article

Employment Quality as a Health Determinant: Empirical Evidence for the Waged and Self-Employed

期刊

WORK AND OCCUPATIONS
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 146-183

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0730888420946436

关键词

employment quality; EU27; European Working Conditions Survey; mental well-being; self-employment; self-rated health; segmented labor market theory; waged employment

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [G.0368.16N]
  2. EU [730998, 665501]
  3. Social Statistics/Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research
  4. Alliance Manchester Business School
  5. FWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found strong associations between employment quality and mental well-being, as well as self-reported general health, particularly for the most precarious employment arrangements. This highlights the importance of recognizing employment quality as a determinant of health for both waged workers and the self-employed.
In this study, the authors investigate the health associations of different employment arrangements in the contemporary European labor market. In doing so, a new approach based on the concept of employment quality is introduced. Employment quality refers to the multiple dimensions characterizing the employment situation of wage- and self-employed (European Working Conditions Survey 2015 -N = 31,929). Latent class cluster analyses were applied to construct an overarching typology of employment quality for the waged and self-employed. Using logistic regression analyses, strong associations were found with mental well-being and self-reported general health, pointing at a disadvantaged situation for the most precarious employment arrangements. The study shows that employment quality should be taken seriously as a health determinant both among waged workers and the self-employed. Our (novel)holistic approachoffers an alternative to current analyses of the health associates of labor market segmentation that were criticized for being overly simplistic and amounting to inconclusive findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据