4.3 Article

Paradigm shift in Danish wind power: the (un)sustainable transformation of a sector

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1799769

关键词

Danish wind power; socio-technical agencement; paradigm shift; social acceptance; conceptual model

资金

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research [1305-00021B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the origin and transformation of the Danish wind power sector, focusing on the changing roles of electricity producers. By tracking the transformation through five dimensions, the shift from distributed power source to critical infrastructure has marginalized local players and mobilized new types of producers and ownership forms.
The Danish wind power sector grew out of a combination of small and medium-sized entrepreneurial firms and local pioneers forming small-scale wind farm cooperatives. This paper studies the initial organisation and subsequent transformation of the socio-technical assemblage or 'agencement' around wind power in Denmark, focusing on the changing roles and agency of electricity producers. We propose a conceptual model for mapping the transformation over time, following five entangled dimensions: capitalisation instruments, turbine technology, capital investment, regulation of finance and ownership modes. We show how changes in all five socio-material dimensions have produced a 'paradigm shift', reconfiguring wind power from a distributed power source to critical infrastructure. This shift has marginalised local players and mobilised new types of producers and ownership forms. Using the conceptual model, we map the controversy resulting from the paradigm shift. Our relational lens of market studies within Science & Technology Studies captures how wind power's 'sustainability' has become contested, and how this cannot be understood as a matter of 'community acceptance' dissociated from material factors. Proposing our conceptual model for future studies, we contribute not only to the extant social acceptance literature, but also to critical energy debates on the governance of climate change and sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据