4.5 Article

Just-in-Place labor: Driver organizing in the Uber workplace

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20949266

关键词

Platform; gig economy; labor geography

资金

  1. Urban Studies Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the socio-spatial dynamics of worker agency in the platform economy in the Washington, D.C. region, focusing on how Uber's innovation of creating just-in-place workers and their efforts to keep workers in just the right place can actually enable new modes of organization. The research highlights the collective and spatial conditions of laboring under and through new technologies, and how workers at a D.C. airport overcame socio-spatial atomization to challenge their emplacement and exercise collective worker agency.
This paper examines the socio-spatial dynamics of worker agency in the platform economy in the Washington, D.C. region. Drawing on the field of labor geography, we document the collective and inherently spatial conditions of laboring under and through new technologies for three years prior to, and six months after, a strike by Uber drivers in May 2019. In doing so, we explore what Uber's platform means for the production, accumulation, and contestation of power. We argue that the big innovation of this platform is the creation of a just-in-place worker. Akin to those materials for assembly lines that arrived just-in-time for production, so too do drivers end up in just the right place for Uber's services to be offered. We also argue that Uber's attempts to keep its workers just-in-place, which generally isolate and disempower drivers, can actually enable new modes of organization. At a D.C. airport, drivers who were emplaced in a parking lot overcame one of the fundamental conditions of the Uber workplace: socio-spatial atomization. The airport became a space in which the just-in-place worker could, at least for a time, challenge such emplacement and exercise a form of collective worker agency by re-working Uber's dynamic pricing system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据