4.5 Article

Research on external financial risk measurement of China real estate

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 5472-5484

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2075

关键词

China real estate market; financial market; information spillover effect; real estate financial risk; time-varying characteristic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a significant information spillover effect between China's real estate markets and related stock markets, and China's real estate is in a net information receiving position. After 2016, China's real estate financial risks entered a downward adjustment cycle, and financial risks have gradually declined. However, due to limited real estate financial investment channels in China, the nation's real estate markets should still be cautiously controlled and regulated to respond to potential real estate financial risk.
This study applies the method proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz to construct a spillover effect index with which we compare the bilateral information spillover effect and time-varying characteristics of China's real estate markets to those of representative international financial markets from July 2005 to March 2018 to measure the financial risks in China's real estate markets. The empirical results show the following. (a) There is a significant information spillover effect between China's real estate markets and related stock markets, and China's real estate is in a net information receiving position. (b) After 2016, China's real estate financial risks entered a downward adjustment cycle, and financial risks have gradually declined. These results suggest that Chinese real estate markets' de-inventory has achieved remarkable results and that real estate financial risks have been significantly reduced. However, due to China's limited real estate financial investment channels, the nation's real estate markets should still be cautiously controlled and regulated to respond to potential real estate financial risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据