4.4 Article

Evaluation of the Criteria to Distinguish Left Bundle Branch Pacing From Left Ventricular Septal Pacing

期刊

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 1166-1177

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.018

关键词

cardiac resynchronization therapy; criteria; His bundle pacing; left bundle branch; left bundle branch pacing; left ventricular septal pacing; time from stimulus to left ventricular activation

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang [2019C03012]
  2. Natural Science for Youth Foundation [81900345]
  3. Major Project of the Science and Technology of Wenzhou [ZS2017010]
  4. Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center [SHDC2020CR4003]
  5. Medtronic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrogram characteristics for confirmation of left bundle branch capture. The findings suggest that direct LBB capture can be confirmed by recording retrograde His potential and anterograde left conduction system potentials.(ActionEvent - American College of Cardiology Foundation)
OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the predictive value of the proposed electrocardiogram and intracardiac electrogram characteristics for confirmation of left bundle branch (LBB) capture. BACKGROUND Previously proposed criteria to distinguish left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septum (LVS) pacing (LVSP) have not been fully validated. METHODS A His bundle pacing lead, an LBBP lead, and a multielectrode catheter at the LVS were placed. Direct LBB capture was defined as demonstration of retrograde His potential on the His bundle pacing lead and/or anterograde left conduction system potentials on the multielectrode catheter during LBBP. The routinely used parameters-His, LBB potential, time from stimulus to peak ventricular activation (Stim-LVAT), and paced QRS morphology during LVSP and LBBP at various depths and outputs were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty patients (21 non-left bundle branch block [LBBB], 9 LBBB) who demonstrated direct LBB capture using the defined criteria were included. The proportion of paced right bundle branch block was 100% during LBB capture in all patients compared to 23.4% in non-LBBB and 44.4% in LBBB during LVSP. LBB potential was recorded in all patients during intrinsic rhythm (non-LBBB group) or His corrective pacing in LBBB. Paced QRS duration was longer during selective LBBP compared to nonselective LBBP or LVSP only. All patients with characteristics of selective LBBP or abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT of >_10 ms demonstrated LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS Direct LBB capture can be confirmed by recording retrograde His potential and anterograde left conduction system potentials. Abrupt decrease in Stim-LVAT of >_10 ms and demonstration of selective LBBP could be used as simple criteria to confirm LBB capture. (J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2021;7:1166-1177) (c) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据