4.5 Article

Magnitude of sex differences in visual search varies with target eccentricity

期刊

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 178-188

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01796-7

关键词

Visual perception; Visual search; Sex differences; Lateralization

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP190103286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that males displayed higher accuracy and shorter reaction time in visual search tasks when targets were presented in the left visual field, with sex differences diminishing as the target moved further rightward. This suggests that greater hemispheric asymmetry in males influences task performance across the visual field.
A recent meta-analysis found no support for the popular theory that superior visuospatial ability in males is attributable to their relatively greater hemispheric asymmetry of neural functions. However, the issue of whether differences in hemispheric laterality could account for differences in visual perception between the sexes has not been systematically investigated. Visual search is an ideal task for such an investigation, as target-position can be systematically varied across the visual field allowing for a detailed analysis of how performance varies with visual field and eccentricity. We recruited 539 undergraduate participants (150 male) and administered a visual search task that required them to identify the presence of a uniquely-oriented triangle amongst distractors. Crucially, target location was systematically varied over the visual field across trials. Males displayed both superior accuracy and shorter reaction time when targets were presented in the left visual field, whilst sex differences systematically diminished when the target was located further rightward. These behavioural results are in line with the notion that greater hemispheric asymmetry in males influences task performance to a varying extent across the visual field, and illustrates the importance of considering task parameters and the influence of sex in behavioural research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据