4.0 Article

Psychosis as a dialectic of aha- and anti-aha-experiences: a qualitative study

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1798492

关键词

Psychosis; aha-experience; phenomenology; first-person experience; qualitative research

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [FWO Odysseus grant] [GOF8416N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sudden insights, both aha and anti-aha experiences, are often reported by individuals with psychosis. The dialectic tension between these experiences may undermine a stable personal perspective.
Experiences of sudden and abrupt insight, sometimes termed aha-experiences, are often reported during psychosis. The aha-experience is described as a radical and sudden restructuring, realization or change in understanding. Based on personal experience, we argued that alongside this aha-experience exists theanti-aha-experience. The anti-aha-experience refers to an experience of sudden insight that does not fit within one's framework, convictions or worldview and has an undermining effect. We have conceptualized psychosis as a dialectic of aha- and anti-aha-experiences and argue that a dialectic tension between aha- and anti-aha experiences undermines a stable personal perspective. In this study, we set out to investigate whether individuals with lived experience of psychosis do indeed report forms of sudden insight, and particularly if they report aha- and anti-aha-experiences, and the dialectic between them. We therefore conducted 21 in-depth interviews and 6 focus groups with individuals with lived experience of psychosis and analyzed the transcripts using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The findings show that these phenomena are indeed often reported and could play a significant role in psychosis. Integrating these phenomena into our understanding of psychosis could help to better grasp the lived experience of individual patients and additionally inform other forms of research on psychosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据