4.3 Article

Critical risk factors in ship fire accidents

期刊

MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 895-913

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2020.1821110

关键词

Ship fire accident; grounded theory; fault tree analysis; Bayesian network; risk factor analysis; maritime accident investigation report

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71904117, 71573172]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [18ZDA052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a new framework for identifying critical risk factors in ship fire accidents, utilizing grounded theory and fault tree analysis. Results indicate that sealing off the ship cabin timely, effective ventilation system, and prompt emergency response are dominant factors for fire prevention.
Risk management of ship fire accidents (SFA) is a vital issue in maritime transportation systems since ship fires are instantaneous and developing events-small errors can cause serious accidents. The traditional approach for SFA analysis is on a coarse-grained level, using accident data from one or several case studies or expert knowledge; such data acquisition method substantially relies on subjective expert experience and brings about epistemic uncertainties. This study proposes a new framework for identifying critical risk factors in SFA. First, grounded theory (GT) is applied to obtain risk factors on a fine-grained level by converting unstructured text information to structured accident data. Then, Fault tree analysis (FTA) is used to develop a risk model and make a quantitative analysis of the SFA. Bayesian network (BN) is also integrated to verify and identify the critical risk factors in SFA with sensitivity analysis. Results indicate that sealing off the ship cabin timely, effective ventilation system, as well as prompt emergency response by crews and passengers on board are the dominant factors. Our findings provide useful insights for maritime safety administration and shipping companies to take actions for fire prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据