4.6 Article

Psychological inflexibility mediates the relationship between fear of negative evaluation and psychological vulnerability

期刊

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 4265-4277

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-01074-8

关键词

Psychological inflexibility; Fear of negative evaluation; Psychological vulnerability; Acceptance and commitment therapy; Counseling; Mental health; College students

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the issues faced by college students worldwide and in Turkey, and the role of psychological inflexibility in these issues. It found that psychological inflexibility partially mediates the relationship between fear of negative evaluation and psychological vulnerability, providing a foundation for evidence-based research and practices.
College students worldwide and in Turkey face many biopsychosocial spiritual and economic issues, in part due to developmental and contextual factors. Understanding these issues and their relationship with psychological inflexibility, which is the central concept to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), is an unexplored gap in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the mediating and moderating roles of Psychological Inflexibility (PI) in the relationship between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Psychological Vulnerability (PV), and to set an empirical ground for developing evidence-based research and practices based on ACT. The study group consisted of 389 undergraduate students studying in various departments of a mid-sized urban state university. Regression-based mediation and moderation testing procedures revealed that PI partially mediates the relationship between FNE and PV. Moderating role of PI on the same relationship was not verified. The present findings are deemed to be useful for understanding the relationships of these constructs and developing future mental health research and interventions to address biopsychosocial spiritual issues and enhance wellbeing especially from an ACT perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据