4.7 Article

Configurational paths of employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice perspective

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2056

关键词

corporate social responsibility; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; job performance; job satisfaction; organizational justice; retention intention

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is crucial for organizations aiming to achieve sustainable development and competitive advantage by influencing employee attitudes. Internal and external CSR initiatives promote self-focused and other-focused justice, respectively, shaping positive employee behaviors. High CSR perceptions lead to high perceived justice among employees who attach high importance to justice, and the combination of high perception of internal CSR, external CSR, and organizational justice predicts positive employee outcomes.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is critical for organizations who want to pursue sustainable development and competitive advantage by influencing employee attitudes. Drawing on the deontic justice theory, we argue that internal and external CSR initiatives promote self-focused and other-focused justice, respectively, which contribute to employee-perceived organizational justice and shape positive employee behaviors. This study applied a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method to determine the interactive effects of employee perceptions of CSR practices and organizational justice on employee outcomes. An examination of data from 1,231 employees in Taiwan revealed that high CSR perceptions lead to high perceived justice among employees who attach high importance to justice. In addition, while high perceived justice by itself is insufficient to determine positive employee outcomes, the combination of high perception of internal CSR, external CSR, and organizational justice is sufficient to predict positive employee outcomes. The findings provide implications for both research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据