3.9 Article

Optimal Fractional Order IMC-Based Series Cascade Control Strategy with Dead-Time Compensator for Unstable Processes

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40313-020-00644-2

关键词

Fractional calculus; IMC; ABC algorithm; Series cascade control; Dead-time compensator; Unstable processes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an advanced dead-time compensator-based series cascade control structure is proposed for unstable processes, utilizing fractional order-based internal model control approach. The design of controllers is optimized using constrained artificial bee colony algorithm, with simulation studies conducted to illustrate the advantages of the proposed strategy.
In industrial unstable processes, disturbance rejection is more challenging task than setpoint tracking. So, cascade control structure is widely used in many chemical processes to reject disturbances. In this work, an advanced dead-time compensator-based series cascade control structure (SCCS) is suggested for unstable processes. The suggested SCCS has three controllers (named as primary, secondary and stabilizing controllers). Both primary and secondary controllers are designed using fractional order-based internal model control (IMC) approach. The stabilizing proportional-derivative controller is designed using maximum sensitivity considerations and Routh-Hurwitz stability criteria. Optimal values of the closed-loop time constants and fractional orders of IMC filters are obtained using constrained artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. This ABC algorithm uses a multi-objective function involving minimization of integral of absolute error, integral of time weighted absolute error and integral of squared error. Simulation studies are conducted using some benchmark plant models used in literature for illustrating the advantages of the proposed strategy compared to the state of the art. Moreover, robust stability of the proposed design is analysed and quantitative performance measures are also computed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据