4.5 Article

Removal of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARBs) by ultrafiltration membranes for Nervion river water potabilization

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02985-6

关键词

Ultrafiltration; Antibiotic-resistant bacteria; Drinking water

资金

  1. Basque Regional Government (HAZITEK program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrafiltration membranes combined with in-line coagulation and hydraulic flocculation showed good performance in removing antibiotic-resistant bacteria during potabilization of Nervion river water, but had limitations in removing organic matter and ensuring microbiological quality of treated water.
Ultrafiltration membranes associated with in-line coagulation and hydraulic flocculation were applied for antibiotic-resistant bacteria removal during Nervion river water potabilization. The study was conducted at pilot scale with an ultrafiltration module equipped with three hollow fibre polyvinylidenefluoride membranes (0.04 mu m nominal pore size) with in-line precoagulation-flocculation. The system operated continuously with constant dose of 20 mg FeCl3/L and a stable production of 50 L/h (18.5 lmh), operating in vacuum. All physico-chemical water quality parameters analysed improved, but the yields were variable, highlighting the low capacity to remove organic matter, with a significant influence of influent concentration. A high capacity to retain bacteria was observed for ultrafiltration membranes with total absence of several faecal indicators in the effluent, but the presence of total aerobic bacteria and occasionally faecal coliform or even E. coli strains casts doubt on the microbiological quality of the treated water. Most of the isolated strains in effluent samples were antibiotic-resistant bacteria with a significant percentage of multi-antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which increase the one observed for the isolated strains from influent. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria to beta-lactams, macrolide and the cotrimoxazole antibiotic groups were frequently detected in effluent samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据