Making Authoritarian Environmentalism Accountable? Understanding China's New Reforms on Environmental Governance

One of the key puzzles of authoritarian environmentalism is its dubious effectiveness due to fragmented interests among different political and market actors, which are often found undermining centrally crafted environmental regulations and targets. China recently launched a series of institutional reforms to fix its notorious local implementation gaps on environmental policies. By setting up a stringent central inspection system and holding frequent inquiry meetings with local government leaders, Beijing aims to reconfigure central-local power relations on environmental governance. We argue that these institutional reforms are essentially transforming environmental governance in China into a highly politicized task by enforcing party disciplines rather than legal frameworks. The aim is to rein environmental officers and hold local political leaders accountable. These reforms may significantly reduce local protectionism, yet such highly politicized approach based on coercive party rules and disciplines bears the risk of weakening the role of legal enforcement and can breed discontent among local officers. Consequently, how these new reforms can achieve a desirable central-local relation for addressing China's environmental crisis in the long run is far from certain.

Automated summary

China has launched institutional reforms to address the execution gaps of environmental policies at the local level. By enforcing party disciplines and holding inquiry meetings with local government leaders, Beijing aims to reconfigure power relations in environmental governance. However, the highly politicized approach may weaken the role of legal enforcement and lead to discontent among local officers.