4.5 Article

Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of ESCEO and OARSI 2019 guidelines

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-00523-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. ESCEO
  2. Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases
  3. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [0111]
  4. MRC [G0400491, MC_UP_A620_1015, MC_UU_12011/2, MC_U147585827, MC_U147585819] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both the OARSI and ESCEO guidelines for knee osteoarthritis management offer similar recommendations on core treatments such as education, structured exercise, and weight loss. However, there are notable differences in certain medication recommendations, particularly with regards to pharmaceutical grade glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a heterogeneous disease associated with substantial effects on quality of life, and its clinical management is difficult. Among the several available guidelines for the management of knee OA, those from OARSI and ESCEO were updated in 2019. Here, we examine the similarities and differences between these two guidelines and provide a narrative to help guide health-care providers through the complexities of non-surgical management of knee OA. OARSI and ESCEO both recommend education, structured exercise and weight loss as core treatments, topical NSAIDs as first-line treatments and oral NSAIDs and intra-articular injections for persistent pain. Low-dose, short-term acetaminophen, pharmaceutical grade glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate are recommended by ESCEO whereas OARSI strongly recommends against their use (including all glucosamine and chondroitin formulations). Despite this difference, the two guidelines are consistent in the majority of their recommendations and provide useful treatment recommendations for individuals with OA and health-care providers. A working group including authors of the latest OARSI and ESCEO recommendations for the management of knee osteoarthritis and independent experts compare and contrast these guidelines, and provide insights into their differences that could help inform application of the recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据