4.7 Review

Diverse and unified mechanisms of transcription initiation in bacteria

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 95-109

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41579-020-00450-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [2-R01 GM114450]
  2. Charles H. Revson Foundation [CEN5650030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines universal pathways and diverse regulatory mechanisms in transcription initiation in evolutionarily divergent bacteria, as well as the mechanisms by which antimicrobials inhibit transcription initiation. The study highlights the simplicity of mechanistic studies in transcription initiation in bacteria and the importance of bacteria in human health.
In this Review, Chen, Boyaci and Campbell examine universal pathways and diverse regulatory mechanisms in transcription initiation in evolutionarily divergent bacteria, and they discuss the mechanisms whereby antimicrobials inhibit transcription initiation and the insights those mechanisms provide into the transcription cycle. Transcription of DNA is a fundamental process in all cellular organisms. The enzyme responsible for transcription, RNA polymerase, is conserved in general architecture and catalytic function across the three domains of life. Diverse mechanisms are used among and within the different branches to regulate transcription initiation. Mechanistic studies of transcription initiation in bacteria are especially amenable because the promoter recognition and melting steps are much less complicated than in eukaryotes or archaea. Also, bacteria have critical roles in human health as pathogens and commensals, and the bacterial RNA polymerase is a proven target for antibiotics. Recent biophysical studies of RNA polymerases and their inhibition, as well as transcription initiation and transcription factors, have detailed the mechanisms of transcription initiation in phylogenetically diverse bacteria, inspiring this Review to examine unifying and diverse themes in this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据