4.3 Article

From 'mad cow' crisis to synthetic biology: challenges to EU regulation of GMOs beyond the European context

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-020-09516-1

关键词

Agricultural biotechnology; Gene editing; Synthetic biology; European union; WTO law; Genetically modified organisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by the EU, highlighting the influence of events such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy and public food safety concerns. The differences in approaches between the EU and US regarding GMO regulation have led to conflicts.
This paper provides a historical and legal perspective of EU regulation on genetically modified organisms (GMOs)-through its initial development to its current position-in view of major advancements of modern molecular biotechnologies used for agriculture. We argue that the emergence and development of EU regulation of GMOs were shaped by antecedent events, notably bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or 'mad cow disease' and the public fears that ensued around food safety. These regulatory emergencies were a key factor prompting national governments and EU institutions to work out the framework for the application of the precautionary principle to agricultural biotechnology. Moreover, while modern biotechnology techniques eliminate many of the perceived health and safety risks of earlier predecessors, the EU regulatory framework has been slow to keep up, lacking the proper regulatory tools that allow for a balanced policy approach towards the techniques underlying genome editing and synthetic biology. Difference in approaches to the regulation of GMOs between the EU and US, to a large extent, precipitated the transatlantic conflict over agricultural biotechnology. Specifically, a significant incompatibility between the application of the precautionary principle in the EU and the substantial equivalence in the US to assess GM food and feed risk was the main reason for the international trade dispute. The ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union that genome editing techniques will not be warranted exemption from authorisation process suggests that EU policy on agricultural biotechnology is likely to remain stringent. This may complicate the progress of synthetic biology and render the EU vulnerable to future food security and economic contingencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据