4.7 Review

Genomic control of metastasis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 3-12

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01127-6

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12022/7]
  2. MRC [MC_UU_12022/7] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastasis, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, remains a complex and open question in cancer biology. Comparative genetic studies have revealed diverse temporal patterns of metastatic evolution and how oncogenic pathways acquire metastatic traits from physiological programs. Understanding the interactions between oncogenic drivers and physiological programs may provide novel opportunities for intervention in metastatic progression.
Metastasis remains the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality, and a detailed understanding of the metastatic process could suggest new therapeutic avenues. However, how metastatic phenotypes arise at the genomic level has remained a major open question in cancer biology. Comparative genetic studies of primary and metastatic cancers have revealed a complex picture of metastatic evolution with diverse temporal patterns and trajectories to dissemination. Whole-genome amplification is associated with metastatic cancer clones, but no metastasis-exclusive driver mutations have emerged. Instead, genetically activated oncogenic pathways that drive tumour initiation and early progression acquire metastatic traits by co-opting physiological programmes from stem cell, developmental and regenerative pathways. The functional consequences of oncogenic driver mutations therefore change via epigenetic mechanisms to promote metastasis. Increasing evidence is starting to uncover the molecular mechanisms that determine how specific oncogenic drivers interact with various physiological programmes, and what triggers their activation in support of metastasis. Detailed insight into the mechanisms that control metastasis is likely to reveal novel opportunities for intervention at different stages of metastatic progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据