4.7 Review

PARPs and ADP-ribosylation: recent advances linking molecular functions to biological outcomes

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 101-126

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.291518.116

关键词

poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR); mono(ADP-ribose) (MAR); poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP); gene regulation; DNA repair; RNA biology

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK069710]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP160319]
  3. Cecil H. and Ida Green Center for Reproductive Biology Sciences Endowment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of poly(ADP-ribose) > 50 years ago opened a new field, leading the way for the discovery of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family of enzymes and the ADP-ribosylation reactions that they catalyze. Although the field was initially focused primarily on the biochemistry and molecular biology of PARP-1 in DNA damage detection and repair, the mechanistic and functional understanding of the role of PARPs in different biological processes has grown considerably of late. This has been accompanied by a shift of focus from enzymology to a search for substrates as well as the first attempts to determine the functional consequences of site-specific ADP-ribosylation on those substrates. Supporting these advances is a host of methodological approaches from chemical biology, proteomics, genomics, cell biology, and genetics that have propelled new discoveries in the field. New findings on the diverse roles of PARPs in chromatin regulation, transcription, RNA biology, and DNA repair have been complemented by recent advances that link ADP-ribosylation to stress responses, metabolism, viral infections, and cancer. These studies have begun to reveal the promising ways in which PARPs may be targeted therapeutically for the treatment of disease. In this review, we discuss these topics and relate them to the future directions of the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据