4.7 Article

Acetylene hydrochlorination over supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) gold-based catalyst: Stabilization of cationic Au species via chemical activation of hydrogen chloride and corresponding mechanisms

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 334-346

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63617-8

关键词

Acetylene hydrochlorination; Electron density; Hydrogen chloride activation; Stabilization mechanism; Gold-based supported ionic liquid phase catalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606199]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [LGG20B060004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new strategy was reported in this study to activate HCl using the Au-SILP technology with [N(CN)(2)(-)] anion, leading to improved stability of gold-based catalysts in acetylene hydrochlorination. This strategy enhances the reaction path and catalyst stability without changing the reaction triggered by acetylene adsorption.
The activation of HCl by cationic Au in the presence of C2H2 is important for the construction of active Au sites and in acetylene hydrochlorination. Here, we report a strategy for activating HCl by the Au-based supported ionic liquid phase (Au-SILP) technology with the [N(CN)(2)(-)] anion. This strategy enables HCl to accept electrons from [N(CN)(2)(-)] anions in Au-[N(CN)(2)(-)] complexes rather than from pure [Bmim][N(CN)(2)], leading to notable improvement in both the reaction path and the stability of the catalyst without changing the reaction triggered by acetylene adsorption. Furthermore, the induction period of the Au-SILP catalyst was shown to be absent in the reaction process due to the high Au(III) content in the Au(III)/Au(I) site and the high substrate diffusion rate in the ionic liquid layer. This work provides a facile method to improve the stability of Au-based catalysts for acetylene hydrochlorination. (C) 2021, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据