4.7 Article

Pt nanoparticles encapsulated on V2O5 nanosheets carriers as efficient catalysts for promoted aerobic oxidative desulfurization performance

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 557-562

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63685-3

关键词

Oxidative desulfurization; Aerobic oxidation; V2O5 nanosheets; Pt nanoparticles; Dibenzothiophene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21722604, 21766007, 21978119]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190243]
  3. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province
  4. Society Development Fund of Zhenjiang City [SH2019020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Pt nanoparticles with sizes around 4-5 nm were effectively encapsulated on vanadium pentoxide nanosheets, resulting in a catalyst with excellent catalytic aerobic oxidation performance for deep desulfurization. The catalysts were able to be reused at least seven times, showing great potential for practical applications.
Platinum group metals (PGMs) usually exhibit promising aerobic catalytic abilities, providing a green and feasible oxidative desulfurization method. However, often, the PGM nanoparticles (NPs) get leached, and the catalysts are deactivated. In this work, Pt NPs with particle sizes of approximately 4-5 nm were encapsulated effectively and uniformly on the surface of vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) nanosheets (with thicknesses of approximately six atomic layers) through strong metal-support interactions. The synthesized catalysts promote catalytic aerobic oxidation reactions, realizing deep desulfurization (99.1%, < 5 mu g g(-1)) under atmospheric pressure and 110 degrees C reaction temperature. Remarkable degrees of sulfur removal could be achieved for oils with different initial S-concentrations and substrates. Additionally, the as-prepared catalysts could be recycled for reuse at least seven times. (C) 2021, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据