4.3 Review

The role of basophils in acquired protective immunity to tick infestation

期刊

PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12804

关键词

acquired immunity; basophil; histamine; IgE; IL‐ 3; mast cell; Tick

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19K07620, 19H01025]
  2. Oshimo Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H01025, 19K07620] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ticks are blood-feeding ectoparasites that can transmit pathogens, causing infectious diseases, but acquired immunity in hosts can reduce their ability to feed on blood and transmit pathogens. Basophils play a key role in this process and are essential for acquired tick resistance.
Ticks are blood-feeding ectoparasites that transmit a variety of pathogens to host animals and humans, causing severe infectious diseases such as Lyme disease. In a certain combination of animal and tick species, tick infestation elicits acquired immunity against ticks in the host, which can reduce the ability of ticks to feed on blood and to transmit pathogens in the following tick infestations. Therefore, our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of acquired tick resistance (ATR) can advance the development of anti-tick vaccines to prevent tick infestation and tick-borne diseases. Basophils are a minor population of white blood cells circulating in the bloodstream and are rarely observed in peripheral tissues under steady-state conditions. Basophils have been reported to accumulate at tick-feeding sites during re-infestation in cattle, rabbits, guinea pigs and mice. Selective ablation of basophils resulted in a loss of ATR in guinea pigs and mice, illuminating the essential role of basophils in the manifestation of ATR. In this review, we discuss the recent advance in the elucidation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying basophil recruitment to the tick-feeding site and basophil-mediated ATR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据