3.8 Article

Scarcity Pricing for Water Demand Management: A Case Study in Campina Grande - Brazil

出版社

L & H SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING, LLC
DOI: 10.5890/JEAM.2021.03.007

关键词

Water tariff; reservoir volume; Scarcity price; Conservation; Sustainability

资金

  1. FAPESB - Foundation of Support for Research of the State of Bahia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a model of water scarcity pricing (WSP) based on analysis of reservoir data showing significant reductions in water demand during years of low water levels. The study also demonstrates that scarcity prices are accepted as socially just and can be implemented in regions facing similar water scarcity conditions.
Despite being still little explored, tariff policies have a large potential to foster more efficient management of water resources, mainly in scarcity regions. Therefore, this paper proposes a model of water scarcity pricing (WSP), based on the storage average monthly data and historical average data of the volume of the reservoir between January 1996 and December 2017, besides the fixation coefficients of adjustments for each operational range and zones of accumulation of reservoir Epitacio Pessoa. The simulated results point to an annual percentage of significant reductions in water demand, mainly in years of low levels of water stocks in the reservoir, for example, 8% in the years 1998-2001 and almost 13% for 2016-2017. Moreover, it was also verified, through the water budget boundary (percentage of water bill over average residential income), that scarcity prices are accepted as socially just, because this rate is below the affordable index of 5%, as recommended by the World Bank. The WSP model has been created for the Water and Sewage Company that operates in Campina Grande, but might be easily implemented in all other regions that are supplied by surface reservoirs and operate under similar water scarcity conditions. (C) 2021 L&H Scientific Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据