4.5 Article

PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 1345-1355

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03498-0

关键词

Urothelial carcinoma; Bladder cancer; PD-L1; Biomarker; Immune checkpoint blockade

资金

  1. French Urological Association (Association Francaise d'Urologie)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review critically evaluated the role of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma, discussing its limitations in clinical practice. Evidence data regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker were detailed, including companion diagnostic assays and scoring methods. Use of PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies are restricted to patients with PD-L1 positive status in certain clinical settings, while identification of biomarkers with high negative predictive value is crucial for non-responders.
Purpose While immunotherapy has become an increasingly attractive strategy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer, the need for a biomarker to identify patients whose cancer is the most likely to respond has never been more crucial. This review systematically evaluates evidence regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma, and discusses its current limits in routine clinical practice. Methods We performed a critical review of PubMed/Medline according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Prospective clinical trials evaluating anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in urothelial bladder carcinoma together with retrospective studies evaluating PD-L1 expression in patients with bladder cancer were included. Results Evidence data related to PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy across clinical trials are detailed in this review. The different companion diagnostic assays, and the methods for PD-L1 scoring in urothelial bladder carcinoma are reported. Additionally, the issues related to the implementation of PD-L1 testing in clinical practice are discussed. Conclusions PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are restricted to patients with PD-L1 positive status in the first-line setting in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma who are ineligible to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Importantly, the use of anti-PD(L)1 mAb in the other clinical settings is not based on PD-L1 status, but rather on patients' clinical characteristics. Further identification of biomarkers with high negative predictive value will also be of utmost importance to identify patients who may not respond to such immunotherapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据