4.6 Review

Carbon dioxide sequestration in underground formations: review of experimental, modeling, and field studies

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-020-01028-7

关键词

CO2 sequestration; Saline aquifers; Capillary trapping; Green house gases; Field scale studies

资金

  1. College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences (CPG) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia [SF20006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed experimental, modeling, and field studies related to underground storage of CO2, emphasizing recent advancements in simulation and modeling, as well as the environmental impact and challenges associated with CO2 sequestration. Additionally, a brief history of selected field scale projects was presented, providing a comprehensive guide to the CO2 storage process from multiple perspectives.
Carbon dioxide has gradually found widespread usage in the field of science and engineering while various efforts have focused on ways to combat the menace resulting from the release of this compound in the atmosphere. A major approach to combating this release is by storage in various geological formations ranging from depleted reservoir types such as saline aquifers to other carbon sinks. In this research study, we reviewed the experimental, modeling, and field studies related to the underground storage of CO2. A considerable amount of research has been conducted in simulating and modeling CO2 sequestration in the subsurface. This review highlights some of the latest contributions. Additionally, the impact of CO2 sequestration on its surroundings due to chemical reactions, adsorption, capillarity, hysteresis, and wettability were reviewed. Some major challenges associated with CO2 injection have also been highlighted. Finally, this work presents a brief history of selected field scale projects such as Sleipner, Weyburn, In Salah, Otway Basin, Snohvit, Alberta, Boundary Dam, Cranfield, and Ketzin. Thus, this study provides a guide of the CO2 storage process from the perspectives of experimental, modelling, and existing field studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据